Some reference-management tools recommend articles of interest on the basis of what’s already in the user’s library.
#READCUBE PAPERS EXPORT REFERENCE LIST PDF#
ReadCube Papers offers an ‘enhanced PDF’ experience, which fleshes out the PDF with supplementary material and hyperlinks. External search functions let them import articles - for instance, from PubMed or Google Scholar, or in Mendeley’s case, from a custom catalogue of more than 100 million papers. Built-in PDF viewers enable them to read and annotate documents, to highlight key passages and take notes. With most reference managers, users can organize their libraries with folders and tags, and search for articles by author name, keyword, text and notes. (Other reference managers also have this option.) “It facilitated the tracking of updated, recently published and curated scientific literature,” she says. She uses Mendeley’s mobile app, and found that the convenience of saving references that she found on Twitter helped with her doctoral dissertation. Juliana Soares Lima, a reference librarian at the Federal University of Ceará in Brazil, is a Mendeley Advisor - a volunteer regional ambassador for Mendeley’s reference-management software. Some (including Paperpile, RefWorks and Sciwheel) are exclusively web-based, meaning there is no installation or cloud syncing required, and most provide mobile apps that allow users to read and add references from their smartphones or tablets. Reference managers are typically desktop applications with an associated web interface that allows researchers to remotely access their own user ‘libraries’ - curated lists of references and associated PDFs - as well as browser plug-ins that make it easy to import references from a journal web page or other online source. The variables considered include cost, cloud-storage limits, operating-system compatibility and support for annotating PDFs (for a list of various reference managers and their features, see Supplementary table). “Having a reference manager versus not having a reference manager is just a sea change,” he says.įrancavilla catalogued some basic criteria for choosing a reference manager in a 2018 review ( M. Michael Francavilla, a paediatric radiologist at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, uses his reference manager as an electronic brain - a place where he can store what he’s learnt about the conditions he treats, as well as informative graphics that he can share with patients and trainees. Weeks later, on the advice of a university librarian, she was using Zotero to insert citations in an online magazine when she was moved to tweet: “HOW AM I JUST USING A CITATION MANAGER FOR THE FIRST TIME?” Reference features So she turned to an online bibliography generator, and “used as few citations as possible to save myself some pain”, she says.
#READCUBE PAPERS EXPORT REFERENCE LIST SOFTWARE#
But for her exam, she needed a format that Google Scholar didn’t support, and she had no time to learn to use a new piece of software that did. She had been using Google Scholar, which can output references in only a small number of styles. When Wissel took the preliminary examinations required by her department at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, to advance in her doctoral programme, she struggled with the citations. For PhD student Emily Wissel, who studies how the microbiome affects pregnancy, it was Zotero’s status as a freely available, open-source project that led her to favour it over other software. (ReadCube Papers is supported by Digital Science - part of Holtzbrinck, the majority shareholder in Nature’s publisher, Springer Nature.)įor Goldacre, Paperpile’s seamless compatibility with Google Docs, which the team uses for collaborative writing, is what tipped the scales towards its use. There are dozens of options, including EndNote, Mendeley Reference Manager, ReadCube Papers, RefWorks, Sciwheel and Zotero. Reference-management tools, also called citation managers, perform a handful of related functions: searching the literature storing and organizing PDFs of papers and supplementary materials generating bibliographies and fostering collaboration. That’s because it dovetails nicely with his team’s workflow. Goldacre, who is also director of the DataLab at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, UK, explains: “Paperpile is the first time I’ve used a reference manager where it didn’t make me want to punch myself in the face on a regular basis out of sheer rage.
![readcube papers export reference list readcube papers export reference list](https://blog.everydayscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/readcube3-300x191.png)
![readcube papers export reference list readcube papers export reference list](https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.freshdesk.com/data/helpdesk/attachments/production/30012268382/original/4gA8gJ9NIr13j39bZu8P4K7GHcAvY1t9pg.png)
Physician Ben Goldacre, for instance, has tweeted at least five times about Paperpile, a subscription-based reference manager that integrates tightly with Google Docs, calling it “amazing”, “fantastic, best ever”, and “unbeLIEVably good”. For such utilitarian tools, reference management software can inspire strong reactions.